athelind: (Default)
[personal profile] athelind
"Are Furries Doomed?"

The premise of this article is that wearing a furry avatar on Second Life is inherently offensive, Because a) nobody goes to SL for anything but sex, and b) sex with a furry is bestiality.

Please do not respond to this article. Yes, it's total crap. It's obviously total crap. The comments are even more inane than the article itself. But, for the love of Coyote and all his little puppies, don't feed the goddamned trolls!!

I am pissed and annoyed that BoingBoing gave these idiots even the brief line-and-link they did.

Warning: This Article Is Not Safe For Work!

cross-posted to [livejournal.com profile] furrymedia

Date: 2007-07-26 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drakegrey.livejournal.com
I know a lot of the troll crowd claims furry hate is "just Internet comedy" - but there are some cases where this borders on obsession or even mania, with how upset it seems to make them.

On the other hand, in their 'generally offensive' policy, Linden has created a too broad parameter - a broad criteria for complaint; now all that's needed is a sufficiently or at least apparently large group to take that advantage.

--Drake

Date: 2007-07-26 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athelind.livejournal.com
Personally, I find most of the creepy uncanny valley humans of SL to be "generally offensive". And you KNOW they're just there for sex.

Profile

athelind: (Default)
athelind

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

November 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
101112 13141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930

Tags

Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 04:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios