![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"Are Furries Doomed?"
The premise of this article is that wearing a furry avatar on Second Life is inherently offensive, Because a) nobody goes to SL for anything but sex, and b) sex with a furry is bestiality.
Please do not respond to this article. Yes, it's total crap. It's obviously total crap. The comments are even more inane than the article itself. But, for the love of Coyote and all his little puppies, don't feed the goddamned trolls!!
I am pissed and annoyed that BoingBoing gave these idiots even the brief line-and-link they did.
cross-posted to
furrymedia
The premise of this article is that wearing a furry avatar on Second Life is inherently offensive, Because a) nobody goes to SL for anything but sex, and b) sex with a furry is bestiality.
Please do not respond to this article. Yes, it's total crap. It's obviously total crap. The comments are even more inane than the article itself. But, for the love of Coyote and all his little puppies, don't feed the goddamned trolls!!
I am pissed and annoyed that BoingBoing gave these idiots even the brief line-and-link they did.
cross-posted to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 05:32 pm (UTC)On the other hand, in their 'generally offensive' policy, Linden has created a too broad parameter - a broad criteria for complaint; now all that's needed is a sufficiently or at least apparently large group to take that advantage.
--Drake
no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 06:38 pm (UTC)