![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
AAAUGH.
The radio station just played one track from Rush's 2112 album.
For those who aren't familiar with it; 2112 is a "concept album" of the sort so beloved of Pretentious Prog Rock Bands like the Trio from Toronto. The "A" side is a single long story-based piece, divided into individual tracks solely for the sake of convenience.
Playing just "The Temple of Syrinx" is like ... like ... cutting off Star Wars right before the Death Star run.
Naturally, I have the CD, so I'm playing the entire album right the heck now, but, nevertheless, the damage is done. I'll have that irritating UNFINISHED feeling for the rest of the night.
How can you DO that?
The radio station just played one track from Rush's 2112 album.
For those who aren't familiar with it; 2112 is a "concept album" of the sort so beloved of Pretentious Prog Rock Bands like the Trio from Toronto. The "A" side is a single long story-based piece, divided into individual tracks solely for the sake of convenience.
Playing just "The Temple of Syrinx" is like ... like ... cutting off Star Wars right before the Death Star run.
Naturally, I have the CD, so I'm playing the entire album right the heck now, but, nevertheless, the damage is done. I'll have that irritating UNFINISHED feeling for the rest of the night.
How can you DO that?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 06:32 am (UTC)To be fair, classical music gets treated like that all the time. You listen to classical music stations and you'll heard Ode to Joy or The March of the Swiss Soldiers without any contextualization at all. And they do that kind of stuff to prog rock all the time. Four words. Thick as a Brick. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 07:18 am (UTC)And, yeah. It bugs me when they do it to "Thick is a Brick", though Tull DID do a special cut of that for radio play. I've heard the radio version of "The Wall" far more often than I've heard the album.
I think one reason it got the AUUGH reaction was that part of my brain was thinking, "gosh, nobody EVER plays 2112 on the radio."
Oh, and a MUCH better metaphor: it was like just playing the "Galileo" parts of "Bohemian Rhapsody".
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 07:43 am (UTC)But, hey, I don't know your pain. I don't even know if we HAVE a radio in the house. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 05:44 pm (UTC)Git offa my lawn, whippersnapper. ::caneshake::
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 08:07 am (UTC)I'll grant that many other concept albums are more easily split up into radioable bits, but as I usually listen to them as whole albums, I get a bit of that sense of incompleteness when, say, certain bits of Dark Side of The Moon are played by themselves.
What's even worse is when the station is doing some thing where they play two songs from the same artist in a block (two-fer Tuesdays) and they run a pair from the same concept album out of order...
Nnnnngh...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 12:32 pm (UTC)Mind you, this was about 20 years ago.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 03:11 pm (UTC)Of course, this is the sort of philosophy that also thinks that you have to play "We Will Rock You" and "We Are The Champions" as one song.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 06:13 pm (UTC)And Journey's "Lovin' Touchin' Squeezin'" and "City of The Angels".
Though that second pairing seems less common these days on my local radio... More's the pity, as I actually like the latter song more, while it's the former that still gets played.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-23 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-22 10:22 pm (UTC)