Earlier today,
ceruleanst pointed out an article about a wounded American soldier whom the U.S. Army subjected to enhanced interrogation torture, until he signed a paper indicating that he had a preexisting personality disorder when he enlisted, and thus was ineligible for health benefits or disability.
This is, as it transpires, part of a continuing effort to misdiagnose wounded soldiers as having preexiting personality disorders specifically to deny them care and benefits.
Shortly after reading the first article, above, I discovered another article about the suicide rates among military personnel over the last decade, which is larger than the death toll from either the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq. Last year alone, 330 active duty suicides were reported.
That doesn't count the deaths among veterans, who are considered civilians; the VA estimates the suicide rate among veterans at around 6,000 per year.
I wonder how many of those vets were denied health care because of their "personality disorders"?
This is, as it transpires, part of a continuing effort to misdiagnose wounded soldiers as having preexiting personality disorders specifically to deny them care and benefits.
Shortly after reading the first article, above, I discovered another article about the suicide rates among military personnel over the last decade, which is larger than the death toll from either the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq. Last year alone, 330 active duty suicides were reported.
That doesn't count the deaths among veterans, who are considered civilians; the VA estimates the suicide rate among veterans at around 6,000 per year.
I wonder how many of those vets were denied health care because of their "personality disorders"?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 07:26 am (UTC)*patient, resigned sigh*
Date: 2010-04-15 04:24 pm (UTC)Every story has to start somewhere. Once upon a time, when investigative journalism was more common and major news outlets didn't rely almost entirely on Official Press Releases and punditry, this was called a "scoop".
I could be generous and assume that the Major News Outlets are holding off on this while they fact-check and follow up, but I think it's more likely that it's just getting buried. Stories like this don't get a lot of play because they're "off message". They can't be condensed into neat sound bites, they don't paint a good picture of Our Noble Nation , and they don't get the same kind of ratings as the latest dirt on Tiger Woods.
How can you be sure it's credile? It's HUFFPO for crying out loud.
Because, in the course of those three articles, Kors provides source after source, and many of them by name. He gives numbers and data, and references that can, in themselves, be checked and verified. Yes, those things can be falsified, but actually going to the effort to give readers the data to double-check his claims goes a long way toward reinforcing his credibility.
Oh, and because it's not Fox News.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 07:33 am (UTC)The reason they are denying care is because the military only takes responsibility for problems it CAUSES. It's kind of harsh but if it were any other way, a lot of unqualified people would join and possibly get hurt, or hurt others. Think of that incident with the Helicopter guy killing people x 1000.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 04:06 pm (UTC)I should point out that, in the second article, the officer who was defending these diagnoses said:
While Kors asserts that this contradicts "accepted medical understanding", IF this claim is accurate, then it sounds to me like military service exacerbated a condition that had little or no impact on the person's life.
And that makes it hard to lend credence to your position that the military has NO responsibility.
Really, though, it's a simple matter of Following The Numbers: they're denying care because they're cheap bastards and want to Blame the Victims, which is, unfortunately, a fairly common "personality disorder" these days.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 07:34 am (UTC)I am not surprised that the military is screwing people with mental problems. Military honor has always been a chimera, not localized to this event, the US or this time period - always. An honest history of military honor would conclude, I feel, that it has never actually existed outside of literary fancy and a few weirdos whose military careers have largely been destroyed because they possessed it.
This would be longer, but I'm too busy sputtering.
Date: 2010-04-15 03:47 pm (UTC)That would be bad enough.
If Kors is correct, then the military is also screwing wounded people by fabricating mental problems.
This not only outrages me as a veteran, it outrages me as a former health care professional and a scientist. You do not fabricate data in order to hurt people.
And you sure as fuck don't hurt people in order to fabricate your data.
Re: This would be longer, but I'm too busy sputtering.
Date: 2010-04-15 11:31 pm (UTC)The guys who run the military have always been creeps. I agree, that's terrible, rotten and wrong and evil. Absolutely. It is also, however, par for the course.
I don't say that to forgive such behavior, but to suggest that we can't be surprised when scorpions sting.
I do have a solution to the problem, however. Unionize the military. Give the rank-and-file soldier the tools to fight back against the abuse constantly perpetrated by the officers.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-15 04:18 pm (UTC)