Yesterday,
quelonzia and I went to see How to Train Your Dragon.
Magnificent.
I enjoyed it almost as much as I did Kung Fu Panda, and, in fact, if we hadn't seen it in 3D, I probably would have enjoyed it more than KFP—I mean, dragons, right? Alas, I find wearing 3D glasses over my regular glasses to be too distracting for the movie to pull me in quite as much. 3D was an interesting novelty with Coraline and Up, but until I can get prescription 3D lenses, I think I'm going to opt out from here on in.
That small technical issue aside, I loved this movie.
I have to agree with the consensus: between this and Kung Fu Panda, Dreamworks is finally making Pixar-quality movies, rather than just snarky, derivative flicks full "hip" jokes that audiences 20 years from now will need a reference book* to understand.
Let me be clear: How To Train Your Dragon is definitely Pixar quality, without being Pixar-style—and I don't just mean the animation, either. It's as well-paced, as well-written, and it has characters of the same depth and charisma as a Pixar flick.
But it has a completely different feel to it.
Dreamworks has found its ecological niche, and it's not the same niche as Pixar's.
One nice character touch that nobody else has really noted: it would have been very, very easy to present the other Vikings as flat-out stupid and mean. Dreamworks didn't go that route, and my hat's off to them. The vikings are loud, boisterous and coarse, and they have very little patience with things that they don't see as having immediate, practical value—but they aren't stupid. They are smart, savvy, capable professionals who have focused their abilities on a destructive and ultimately-pointless course of action, because they believe it's the only way they can survive.
I'd add more, but I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep.
* Okay, realistically, they'll be clicking on the Clifflinks™ on the hyperlinked video file, but you know what I mean.
Magnificent.
I enjoyed it almost as much as I did Kung Fu Panda, and, in fact, if we hadn't seen it in 3D, I probably would have enjoyed it more than KFP—I mean, dragons, right? Alas, I find wearing 3D glasses over my regular glasses to be too distracting for the movie to pull me in quite as much. 3D was an interesting novelty with Coraline and Up, but until I can get prescription 3D lenses, I think I'm going to opt out from here on in.
That small technical issue aside, I loved this movie.
I have to agree with the consensus: between this and Kung Fu Panda, Dreamworks is finally making Pixar-quality movies, rather than just snarky, derivative flicks full "hip" jokes that audiences 20 years from now will need a reference book* to understand.
Let me be clear: How To Train Your Dragon is definitely Pixar quality, without being Pixar-style—and I don't just mean the animation, either. It's as well-paced, as well-written, and it has characters of the same depth and charisma as a Pixar flick.
But it has a completely different feel to it.
Dreamworks has found its ecological niche, and it's not the same niche as Pixar's.
One nice character touch that nobody else has really noted: it would have been very, very easy to present the other Vikings as flat-out stupid and mean. Dreamworks didn't go that route, and my hat's off to them. The vikings are loud, boisterous and coarse, and they have very little patience with things that they don't see as having immediate, practical value—but they aren't stupid. They are smart, savvy, capable professionals who have focused their abilities on a destructive and ultimately-pointless course of action, because they believe it's the only way they can survive.
I'd add more, but I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep.
* Okay, realistically, they'll be clicking on the Clifflinks™ on the hyperlinked video file, but you know what I mean.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 07:29 am (UTC)That doesn't mean they're not DISTRACTING, though.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 09:13 pm (UTC)See, Pixar has gotten me used to animation with good, grown up stories that kids can still enjoy a great deal. HTTYD is a kids movie but with still a good story and well made enough for adults to enjoy; and that's OK.
I made sure to see it in 2D and I'm glad I did. I find it distracting and the quality of the lenses is not very good. Plus theaters are bad enough about running things too dark, it's only worse when you have to cut that light down by 1/4.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:13 pm (UTC)That being said, I still think How To Train... is the better of the two.
And, well, I did note that actually, as well as several other things. I just didn't put it down. At some point I may do a more spoileriffic review of my own, but I wanted the chance to get a second viewing in first- and that may happen on Monday.
Having seen this one in 3D though, I think that really enhanced my enjoyment of it. Then again, I don't wear glasses at this time. If I did, I'd probably mod the polarized lenses into something I can clip on... But I'm weird. }:D
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 12:51 am (UTC)First, how the dragons were depicted. They were neither good nor evil, but *animals*...and like any animals, they had their own needs, their own often-complex motivations and their own feelings. Toothless acted like any intelligent social animal would have acted in his situation -- fearful and suspicious at first, but in time, learning to trust.
And the flight sequences. Oh God, the flight sequences. I've never seen such scenes -- a couple of times, they moved me to tears.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:16 am (UTC)