athelind: (Default)
[personal profile] athelind
Ah, it's that time of year again. Superbowl Sunday. The day when people all over the country get together to drink beer, eat junk food, and watch expensive commercials that are constantly being interrupted by a mob of Exceedingly Large Men arguing over a leather ovoid.

You know, I know more than a few people who got exposed to high-pressure indoctrination from religiously-inclined family, friends and acquaintences that has left them with a deep-seated loathing of anything even vaguely religious in nature, particularly if it hints of the religious persuasion of those trying to indoctrinate them (and, in North America here on the cusp of the One-And-Twenty, we all know the most likely candidate there). Some of them have moved past the knee-jerk reactions this produces on an intellectual level, but still, on some level, the conditioned response is still there.

Mention "angels" to [livejournal.com profile] kolchis some time.

So I am with football.

In my youth, I had far too many people insist that I should enjoy the game, that if I didn't, I wasn't "normal". In school P.E. classes, no effort was ever made to actually explain the rules -- you were assumed to just magically know, because, after all, you'd been watching it every weekend of your life, and if you hadn't been, what the hell was wrong with you?

Understandably, of course, I rebelled. Oh, I can sit down with my stepfather and follow a game -- mostly because he is actually willing to explain the game and point out the strategies involved. In fact, when I lived a few miles from my folks and would regularly do laundry at their place on Sundays, I found myself fascinated by the tactical intricacies.

Left to my own devices, however -- and happily married to a woman with as little interest in the game as I have myself -- I've backslid into happy heathenism. The gridiron -- and the diamond of that other National Pasttime, for that matter -- has graced my television screen only for as long as it takes me to ascertain that it has once again pre-empted something I actually wanted to watch (usally accompanied by a stream of vocabulary usually reserved to sailors and truck drivers).

Strangely, despite all this, I look forward to this particular day.

Traditionally, I've made a point of doing the geekiest thing I can think of on Superbowl Sunday, something as antithetical to the High Holy Day of the Pigskin Cult as can be. By preference, that's gaming -- pull out the ol' polyhedrals and spend the day romping around some fantasy world. Alas, one of the members of my Ironclaw group must work today.

Instead, [livejournal.com profile] hinoki is coming over. We'll be setting up a web site for him, explaining the basics of HTML, grilling up buffalo and ostrich burgers, and... hooray! ...watching Bad Movies.

The slated marquee includes:

  • Willow: decent acting, but lackluster plot and a setting so generic as to be nonexistent.
  • Dungeons & Dragons: terrible acting and another lackluster plot... in a setting more interesting than any of the settings they actually publish for the damned game. (Yes, I like this movie as much or more than I do Willow. Sue me.)
    And best of all:
  • Roger Corman's Fantastic Four. A movie made by a studio that had no intention of releasing it, strictly to avoid losing the license. I've only heard of this marvel, never seen it -- but the cheetah has somehow scored a copy. I love the FF, I love Corman, and I expect this to be oh so very bad.

I can't wait.

AAAIEEE!!! He's HERE already! And we aren't even DRESSED yet!

Date: 2004-02-01 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jdarkwulf.livejournal.com
Had I been home all day, I probably would've been watching the Charmed marathon. Guess I'll catch what of it I can. :)

Date: 2004-02-01 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] araquan.livejournal.com
Hey, and Willow had Billy Barty in it. That's got to count for something. };>

Date: 2004-02-01 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rikoshi.livejournal.com
Actually, two members of our group need to work today. It's kinda sucktastic like that.

But wow, you liked D&D more than Willow? I think I'm wounded...

Date: 2004-02-01 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aubrin.livejournal.com
*pfffffffffthrrrrbbttt!*

I loved Willow! No cake for youuuuuu!

Date: 2004-02-01 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tealfox.livejournal.com
Mercedes McNab as Young Sue Storm! HARMONY? FROM ANGEL!? Oh my Gawd!

Date: 2004-02-01 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terminotaur.livejournal.com
I can't watch Dungeons & Dragons and not laugh my ass off at Jeremy Irons. Reign it in. I didn't think it was possible to over-play an ego-maniac, but he managed it. :)

Date: 2004-02-01 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stalbon.livejournal.com
I went to see Dungeons & Dragons on opening night at the theatres with a friend or two, and we even got into the same showing as a group who went in full garb, but that doesn't changed how bad the movie was. I tried to convince myself when it was over that it wasn't bad (and really, Josh Whalen wasn't so bad at all), but I was in total denial. It was terrible, even with the dragons in it.

Dungeons & Dragons wasn't bad because

Date: 2004-02-02 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-caton.livejournal.com
1.Tom Baker was in it (madder than a box of frogs)
2.Richard O'Brien was in it (Crystal Maze or Rocky Horror anyone? or Dark City, even)
3.Uma Thurman wasn't in it (unlike Batman & Robin / the Avengers)
4. Aaron Williams ripped the p*ss out of it in "Nodwick" (have a jelly baby?)
5. Jeremy Irons remins me of dear old Tod Slaughter...but squared
6. Dragons! lots and lots of Dragons!
7. The cool skelly who had the rod of dragon control

Date: 2004-02-05 09:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paka.livejournal.com
By the way, thank you for posting the tangent about football. I went through exactly the same thing, and it feels better knowing other people got that.

With D & D, my pet theory is that, because little people never get the big roles, but are always getting gigs, the dwarf's actor was the guy who had the most experience out of all the main characters - which is why he was the best actor, imo.

Date: 2004-02-05 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athelind.livejournal.com
With D & D, my pet theory is that, because little people never get the big roles, but are always getting gigs, the dwarf's actor was the guy who had the most experience out of all the main characters - which is why he was the best actor, imo.

You mean in Willow? Yes, I quite agree. Though I do rather enjoy Madmartigan, even though it's a very young and very green Val Kilmer, not nearly as polished as his later works.

November 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
101112 13141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930

Tags

Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 12:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios