Foster's Freeze?
Jan. 13th, 2004 12:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, there's something I've long heard in the Rumor Mill, but I haven't really been able to find even peripheral documentation.
Alan Dean Foster is possibly one of the most "furry" mainstream SF writer out there -- or perhaps he's the most mainstream Furry writer out there. Like many writers of his era, his SF books have anthropomorphic animals presented as "aliens", though even more prevalent than in the works of Larry Niven or C.J. Cherryh. His Spellsinger series of fantasy novels are even closer to the "Furry" genre, presenting a fantasy world populated not merely with cat-like and lizard-like aliens, but actual anthropomorphic turtles, tigers, otters and so forth.
In 1995, Mr. Foster was Guest of Honor at Conference 6 in Irvine.
I have heard that he was so horrified by his exposure to the fandom as represented by ConFurence's notoriously over-the-top attendees that he vowed never to associate himself with that particular subset of the lunatic fringe again.
I first heard this as an offhand explanation of why we'd never see Foster as the GoH of Further Confusion, despite his work.
I'm just asking for endless flame wars in my LJ, aren't I? First, I ask for OS recommendations; then, I ask about something that, true or not, is almost certainly a majro controversy in fandom.
Alan Dean Foster is possibly one of the most "furry" mainstream SF writer out there -- or perhaps he's the most mainstream Furry writer out there. Like many writers of his era, his SF books have anthropomorphic animals presented as "aliens", though even more prevalent than in the works of Larry Niven or C.J. Cherryh. His Spellsinger series of fantasy novels are even closer to the "Furry" genre, presenting a fantasy world populated not merely with cat-like and lizard-like aliens, but actual anthropomorphic turtles, tigers, otters and so forth.
In 1995, Mr. Foster was Guest of Honor at Conference 6 in Irvine.
I have heard that he was so horrified by his exposure to the fandom as represented by ConFurence's notoriously over-the-top attendees that he vowed never to associate himself with that particular subset of the lunatic fringe again.
I first heard this as an offhand explanation of why we'd never see Foster as the GoH of Further Confusion, despite his work.
I'm just asking for endless flame wars in my LJ, aren't I? First, I ask for OS recommendations; then, I ask about something that, true or not, is almost certainly a majro controversy in fandom.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 01:04 pm (UTC)Furry cons are really no more shocking than any other fannish convention.
As for controversy, I think this one's a cold, dead issue, hell CF6 was nine years ago. Bill Holbrook is another GoH who was at Anthrocon this year, and I've seen him around at multiple cons, maybe he's cool with it, while ADF isn't?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 01:30 pm (UTC)There's a lot more open porn at Furry Cons. Yeah, yeah, there are Slash rooms at other cons. But I've been to lots of cons, and furry cons are the least kid-friendly and most mundane-perplexing.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 08:50 pm (UTC)Most cons I've been to don't HAVE any adult areas - everything has to be PG-13 or less. GenCon, for example. The most shocking thing there were the costumes on the girls shilling the book of Erotic Fantasy, and they were pretty tame. (Actually, the most shocking thing was the guy doing a brisk trade in Wehrmacht and SS marching band CDs...)
That said, I know there are also Trek cons with rooms that specialize in rather racey slash art and fiction, but it is hardly the most obvious thing about the con. Adult themed art IS the most prevalant item up for sale in furry dealer rooms, and not just because it's visible.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 02:13 pm (UTC)I've never seen bestiality room parties at other fannish cons.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 04:15 pm (UTC)What the heck con was this that you went to?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 05:08 pm (UTC)-- ArchTeryx
no subject
Date: 2004-01-15 02:35 am (UTC)Which reminds me, I should complete my Spellsinger collection...
-J