Film at 11: WTF R U PPL THNKNG?
Sep. 30th, 2009 08:48 amNPR: Government Eyes Crackdown on Texting And Driving
Okay, I can understand the argument that using a hands-free phone shouldn't be any more distracting than conversing with a passenger actually in the car -- I can poke several gaping holes in the logic, but I can understand it. I acknowledge the need for those "I promise not to play with the touchscreen while driving" disclaimers on the various HUDs that new cars have.
Texting while driving, though... glancing at messages is bad enough, but actually sending them when you're behind the wheel?
Why is this even an issue? Why is it common enough to be an issue? This should be something that crops up once or twice on the "News of the Weird" or, preferably, the Darwin Award sites -- something that is so flagrantly, suicidally idiotic that most people have to stifle a morbid laugh about it.
It shouldn't be something that's common enough to need a "Government Crackdown".
It's taking your eyes off the road and your hands off the wheel. Don't people listen to The Doors?
Why not read the news while you drive, or take a frakking nap? Hey, next month is NaNoWriMo -- why not write a novel?
Arrrrgh.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:37 pm (UTC)and tales of foreign truck drivers watching DVDs are common in the UK... and one was apparently driving with his feet to make things interesting....
But I'd agree with your assessment of texting whilst driving...
and I'd extend that to pedestrians who wander in the road whilst texting or deep in conversation...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 05:11 pm (UTC)At 75 m.p.h.
This is why the Beltway average six accidents a day.
-The Gneech
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 05:24 pm (UTC)Usually, telling people they are stupid can help -- but when the law does it, stupid people tend to revolt: "You're not the boss of me!" *click-BOOM!*
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 09:44 pm (UTC)You get a cookie.
It's still kind of annoying that a common-sense law SHOULD be controversial.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:38 pm (UTC)My response was to ask what times he commuted, so i knew when to avoid that stretch of road.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 08:42 pm (UTC)I recall at least teen getting killed up here over the summer because she was texting while driving, and had a head on collision with another big truck. :p People really do need to put down the phone and get their heads out of their asses while they're at it.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 09:34 pm (UTC)People reading hardback novels, while driving - while actually in motion, c. 30 mph.
People texting on phones, Blackberries, iPhones.
Women putting on mascara and eyeline (what is this, 1968??)
People reading the newspaper - opened to full tabloid size in front of them.
At least here in crazy messed up lala Los Angeles land I can confirm YES, we done got us a problem, yup. :p
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 10:09 pm (UTC)This was intended for computer stupidity, but it applies just as readily to automotive stupidity as well. Like the others here, I'm horrified at the things I've seen people do while allegedly driving.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 11:45 pm (UTC)I wish somebody could explain the whole attraction of this text thing to me. Email, yes- having been blessed with handwriting so bad that my parents had me learning to touch type at eight, on those rare occasions when I hit top speed I can bat out a message fast enough to make your head spin. But I can't see what is so great about cranking out an "email" one agonizing letter at a time, on a twelve-key keyboard where you have to press the keys up to four times to produce one letter, plus other presses for capitals and so on.
In fact, the only use I can think of for texting is "passing notes in class" or the equivalent.
On the other hand, I can see the attraction of speaking a message and having it automagically converted to text. I've seen a smartphone that does that with the voicemail messages it receives-- very slick. I can see that kind of "texting," where the speech recognition is done at the sending end rather than the receiving end, as being useful for a lot of things. (GETTING a text message is fine, it's typing them out that is the problem for me.) If you wanted to send a "text" from a place where distractions would be Bad, that would be the way to do it.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 11:13 am (UTC)Texting while driving shouldn't be any more distracting than the shaving/makeup/sloppy tacos while driving, except those latter tend to END. You finish eating, or shaving, or makeup. But texting goes on as long as the conversation does. It's something someone could be doing from the time they get in the car until the time they leave.
Still, if you find your car constantly going onto the shoulder while you glance at your phone, it might be a sign that it's a bad idea. Especially when shaving with the other hand.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 03:22 pm (UTC)If you time the flip just right, then the pothole will do it FOR you.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-02 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-03 02:58 am (UTC)And frankly, there are much better things you can put on a HUD, like all-around radar so you can track your corners at all times, or color/intensity based warnings of nearby obstacles and vehicles.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-03 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-03 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-04 06:24 am (UTC)Oh, and I wasn't kidding,
not even by a fraction. Hopefully, when you learn this the hard way, you'll be the only one who pays the tuition.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-04 04:38 pm (UTC)