Film at 11: Cookies > Waterboarding
Jun. 1st, 2009 11:26 amVia boingboing:
Bacon may not make everything better, but cookies do:
This is Pure Undiluted Coyote In Action: the reprehensible deeds of the arrogant and powerful are countered by something that is, at first glance, absurd.
Part of me wants to make a funny, light-hearted post about the wonders of baked goods, full of references to Eddie Izzard and '80s cartoons about Being Nice and '70s superheroes defeating the villains with Hostess Fruit Pies.
Part of me wants to go on a self-righteous tear about how the vile nature of torture is compounded by its ineffectiveness.
Look at the icon: which part do you think won this one?
It's particularly ironic because those who try to defend "enhanced interrogation" love to accuse their opponents of "coddling" terrorist suspect. "Maybe we should just serve them tea and cookies, instead! That's sure to get them to talk!"
Guess what? It does, assholes.
Treating people as people, as human beings, goes a long way toward getting them to see you as human in turn.
Those who defend and support torture don't give a damn about facts or evidence. They don't care about getting useful or accurate information out of these prisoners. They don't even care about the "ticking time bomb" scenario gleaned from their careful, in-depth research into Kiefer Sutherland.
They just want to hurt people, or have people hurt in their name. They just want to cause pain. They don't care about terrorism or any of the rest of it; 9/11 just gave them a justification to do what they've always wanted to do, to indulge their vicious cruelty, and to assert loudly and contemptuously that any other approach is naive and weak.
It is indefensible that I live in a nation that can even debate this issue.
Not when the alternative is cookies.
Bacon may not make everything better, but cookies do:
FBI Interrogator Reports That Cookies Work Better Than Torture.
This is Pure Undiluted Coyote In Action: the reprehensible deeds of the arrogant and powerful are countered by something that is, at first glance, absurd.
Part of me wants to make a funny, light-hearted post about the wonders of baked goods, full of references to Eddie Izzard and '80s cartoons about Being Nice and '70s superheroes defeating the villains with Hostess Fruit Pies.
Part of me wants to go on a self-righteous tear about how the vile nature of torture is compounded by its ineffectiveness.
Look at the icon: which part do you think won this one?
It's particularly ironic because those who try to defend "enhanced interrogation" love to accuse their opponents of "coddling" terrorist suspect. "Maybe we should just serve them tea and cookies, instead! That's sure to get them to talk!"
Guess what? It does, assholes.
Treating people as people, as human beings, goes a long way toward getting them to see you as human in turn.
Those who defend and support torture don't give a damn about facts or evidence. They don't care about getting useful or accurate information out of these prisoners. They don't even care about the "ticking time bomb" scenario gleaned from their careful, in-depth research into Kiefer Sutherland.
They just want to hurt people, or have people hurt in their name. They just want to cause pain. They don't care about terrorism or any of the rest of it; 9/11 just gave them a justification to do what they've always wanted to do, to indulge their vicious cruelty, and to assert loudly and contemptuously that any other approach is naive and weak.
It is indefensible that I live in a nation that can even debate this issue.
Not when the alternative is cookies.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 07:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 07:22 pm (UTC)It seems really obvious that people are more open when they're comfortable and trusted. Anyone who really cares about justice should be able to put aside the hatred that underlies torture (and it surely does) and treat their enemy decently - even if just to get the information they want.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 07:34 pm (UTC)My elementary school teacher gave us a simple way to remember which direction the < and > signs went: it's a mouth, and it wants to eat the bigger number.
Cookies or waterboarding? I know which I'd rather eat.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 02:19 am (UTC)That is easily the oddest compliment I've gotten this month.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 02:27 am (UTC)And, presumably, laughs like Nelson.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 07:38 pm (UTC)Basic. Human. Decency.
What a concept.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 11:29 pm (UTC)The truly disturbing thing would be if they're *enjoying* it. :p
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 11:48 pm (UTC)And of course they're enjoying it. *sighs*
no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-01 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-02 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-04 10:05 pm (UTC)It would be tedious to list the well-known examples where those who wish to control followers do so by training those followers to see "the enemy" as less than human. It suddenly occurs to me that things like the Wah on Terra or the War on Drugs are particularly quick and effective ways to do this. We're not throwing people into concentration camps and torturing them. We're not destroying a teenager's life over a couple of whacky tabaccy cigarettes. No, we're fighting Terra! We're fighting Drugs! No living, breathing, feeling people involved at all. And you're not Soft on Terra, are you?
You don't have to convince your sheep that the enemy is less than human. Instead you've prevented them from seeing that humans are involved at all.
Now the question is, how much of that blindness among the followers is unthinking loyalty to their leaders, and how much of it is willful?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-04 10:12 pm (UTC)"Let me waterboard you and I'll have you confessing to the Sharon Tate murders."
Because of course ordinary, untrained people (if not everybody) will say anything at all to get the pain to stop. That's a lesson we SUPPOSEDLY learned centuries ago from the Church and its witch hunts.