Gush Is Not Bore
May. 2nd, 2007 12:56 pmA question that often comes up when discussing the absolute debacle of the last seven years is whether or not things would have gone as badly after 9/11 if Al Gore had actually been sworn in as President after winning the 2000 election.
From all the information I have at my disposal:
President Gore would not have attacked Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the destruction of the World Trade Center.
George Bush and his cohorts would have attacked Iraq, even if the events of 9/11 had not occurred.
From all the information I have at my disposal:
President Gore would not have attacked Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the destruction of the World Trade Center.
George Bush and his cohorts would have attacked Iraq, even if the events of 9/11 had not occurred.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 08:46 pm (UTC)But in Iraq?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 01:58 am (UTC)Okay, but what I'm asking is, are you saying that Gore would have sent troops to Iraq?
If not, where you say he'd've sent them?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 02:26 am (UTC)I'm not understanding your logic here at all.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 11:29 am (UTC)Okay, I see the source of my confusion now: I misread your original comment. I read, "Gore most likely would [emphasis mine] have treated the armed forces like they were a plastic bucket of army men." Sorry for the bother.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:05 am (UTC)