The Force... vs. Gunkata.
May. 13th, 2005 10:50 amFrom yet another Phantom Heresy Essay:
Kurt Wimmer took a different approach to the same problem in Equilibrium.
And why is the lightsaber the preferred weapon of characters the Force (filmmaker) favors?
Guns are awful from a cinematic point of view. You can’t defend against a gunshot, and because gunshots are almost always serious, the combatants have to either keep missing each other to string it out (in which case they both end up looking useless), or they have to accidentally drop their guns and switch to their kung-fu skills.
George Lucas solved this problem by bringing in the sword, long surpassed in the real world but still superior for cinematic purposes, and changing the rules so this archaic device was back at the cutting edge.
In the saga, the lightsaber is both the badge of Force favor -- it takes great skill and Force ability to wield -- and the most immediate benefit of having the Force with you. Hapless minor characters are forced to rely on blasters, which a lightsaber can easily reflect back.
And the action scenes are better. Lightsabers allow both combatants to be incredibly skilful and still not kill each other instantly -- as they would if they were armed with guns -- and the Force presses this advantage by bestowing multiple cool techniques on those it favors, Force-throws, jumps, flips, outright telekinesis.
Kurt Wimmer took a different approach to the same problem in Equilibrium.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 06:00 pm (UTC)....Right up until resorting to swords again. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-13 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-14 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-14 09:21 pm (UTC)Of course, lightsabers do not have a blunt side or edge, so any training accidents have serious consequences for those who cannot simply attach a spare arm, even if droids were trained and not programmed.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-14 10:54 pm (UTC)The POINT is, a Grammaton Cleric would kick ALL of their asses.
That's why they made Christian Bale BATMAN.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 03:34 am (UTC)My rule of thumb on "Extended Universe" stuff is that stuff that makes it to the screen trumps printed source material.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 01:02 pm (UTC)As for Grievous, at least in the cartoon version, I thought he did at least one force push (arguably, cartoon Grievous is going to be better than the movie version. Nothing more bad-ass than chasing down an elevator from the outside on the building's side.). Course, this could be attributed to his training and what oragics there is intermeshed with the robotic improvements. While probably lacking the mass of meat needed to house the minochlorians for extended force usage, he probably can still take wild attempts at the force if he wants (at the very least, if the Jedi can sense how wicked he is, there must be some force affluence in Grievous. The extended universe has shown a few races completely free of the force and the effect such plays on Jedi sensing them).
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 03:35 am (UTC)This Will Rawk.