Feed Your Head: Always an Option!
Jun. 16th, 2010 09:58 pmLast week's Yoda quote raised a little controversy in the comments.
Here's another quote that I find equally compelling:
In my mind, this does not conflict in any way with Yoda's "Do, or do not; there is no try."
Let's put that into some context, courtesy CNET:
As Unca Sammy taught me to say:
When Yoda says, "that is why you fail1", he's saying "you have sabotaged yourself with your own doubt and disbelieve, and your impatience has caused you to surrender when you have actually made headway toward accomplishing your goal." Only, you know, in backwards Muppet Moonspeak.
When Adam says "failure2 is not an option", he's saying that, to an experimenter, there are no failures: there are unanticipated successes.
They are the same word, but they are not the same idea.
The "Feed Your Head" series started with the subject line, "Things I KNOW, but need to LEARN". If I sound didactic, rest assured that you are not the intended student body.
Which doesn't mean you're not welcome to audit the course, naturally.
Here's another quote that I find equally compelling:
"Failure is always an option!"
—Adam Savage, Mythbusters
In my mind, this does not conflict in any way with Yoda's "Do, or do not; there is no try."
Let's put that into some context, courtesy CNET:
That leads to another question I wanted to ask: Talk about the notion of "Failure is always an option."
Savage: Well, people always imagine a scientist sets up an experiment to prove something. When it doesn't, they imagine him saying "my experiment was a failure." In fact, a real scientist sets up an experiment to test something. If he was wrong about his preconceptions, he's far from upset. In fact, it means something else entirely new has been illuminated. This is how it is for us, and thus we say that any experiment that yields data, even if we were wrong about what that data would be, is a successful experiment.
As Unca Sammy taught me to say:
Failure1 is not Failure2.
When Yoda says, "that is why you fail1", he's saying "you have sabotaged yourself with your own doubt and disbelieve, and your impatience has caused you to surrender when you have actually made headway toward accomplishing your goal." Only, you know, in backwards Muppet Moonspeak.
Failure1 means giving up.
When Adam says "failure2 is not an option", he's saying that, to an experimenter, there are no failures: there are unanticipated successes.
Failure2 means learning something new.
They are the same word, but they are not the same idea.
The "Feed Your Head" series started with the subject line, "Things I KNOW, but need to LEARN". If I sound didactic, rest assured that you are not the intended student body.
Which doesn't mean you're not welcome to audit the course, naturally.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 10:04 am (UTC)Example: a couple of months ago, I asked my kids to decide which was greater, 5/8 or 3/4, and then prove it. An awful lot of them decided they thought 5/8 was greater. I didn't correct them; I told them they had a hypothesis and now they had to test it. I had a couple of kids who were convinced until the end of the second trial that the first trial was wrong and 5/8 really was greater. Then I had to coach them out of their dejection by pointing out that they hadn't given up, they'd accepted the right answer when it was staring them in the face, and they'd revised their hypothesis at the end without lying about what their original hypothesis had been. I gave them the same mark that I gave to the kids who got the hypothesis right to begin with.
It's much, much harder to apply this idea to life lessons than it is to lab work or math, though. We're trained from early childhood to see mistakes as bad things that lower our rewards from the exercise (grades at first, later money or prestige.) It's hard to get past that.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 03:34 pm (UTC)This calls for a RUSH QUOTE!
Date: 2010-06-17 03:52 pm (UTC)Fight without ever winning
But never, ever win
Win without a fight."
-- Rush, "Resist",
from Test for Echo
no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 04:55 pm (UTC)Re: This calls for a RUSH QUOTE!
Date: 2010-06-17 05:21 pm (UTC)All my wins have been without fighting.
Maybe fighting PREVENTS winning?
Re: This calls for a RUSH QUOTE!
Date: 2010-06-17 06:51 pm (UTC)Re: This calls for a RUSH QUOTE!
Date: 2010-06-17 10:53 pm (UTC)Re: This calls for a RUSH QUOTE!
Date: 2010-06-22 12:16 am (UTC)-Rush "Armor and Sword"
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 12:53 am (UTC)The sad thing is how many want to just give up. I don't know how many I've taught experimental techniques to. When something goes wrong they want to throw it all out and start again. I keep telling them that these techniques aren't set in stone. Their mistake may not matter to the final experimental result, or may show something different. Either way everyone could learn from it, and maybe modify the experimental protocol. My first paper was a shot in dark at what seemed reasonable. :)
I suppose its the same in life. Much as I try so hard to avoid massive mistakes, they have often been the major source for improvement in who I am. However, they only are as long as I try to learn. velvetpage is right that it is a harder thing to apply to life lessons, yet I think its vital that we do.