Plop Culture: the Zombie Apocalypse
Oct. 22nd, 2009 10:49 pmI may have finally figured out why the current pop culture fascination with zombies does nothing but irritate me.
Ever have to hook a line to a three-month-old sea lion carcass to pull it off the breakwall where it shuffled off its mortal coil?
We had to do that several times a year during my billet at Coast Guard Group Monterey.
Dead, bloated, rotting things trailing gobbets of putrid flesh?
They don't faze me. They don't horrify me.
They annoy me. They represent an unpleasant-but-necessary task, and nothing more.
At the same time, I have a much clearer, more visceral understanding of what such a situation would be like. On an olfactory level, among others.
So, no, thank you, I won't participate in your Zombie Walk, and I don't wanna go see Zombieland.
Ever have to hook a line to a three-month-old sea lion carcass to pull it off the breakwall where it shuffled off its mortal coil?
We had to do that several times a year during my billet at Coast Guard Group Monterey.
Dead, bloated, rotting things trailing gobbets of putrid flesh?
They don't faze me. They don't horrify me.
They annoy me. They represent an unpleasant-but-necessary task, and nothing more.
At the same time, I have a much clearer, more visceral understanding of what such a situation would be like. On an olfactory level, among others.
So, no, thank you, I won't participate in your Zombie Walk, and I don't wanna go see Zombieland.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 06:22 am (UTC)Come to think of it, I can't see the attraction to Vampires either. Especially the sparkly ones of sudden modern fame. Besides, everyone knows that Werewolves are the best of the three. :3 And Dragons are top dog, so to speak. We need more Dragon games/Movies/Merch. To hell with this zombie and sparkly vampire thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 06:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 07:53 am (UTC)Fools. It should be dragons.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 07:53 am (UTC)What further amuses me, intensely, is how almost no one acknowledges that. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 09:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 11:21 am (UTC)I definitely don't go out of my way to see zombie movies (in fact, there're a few big, big "must sees" that I've missed, but that's a story for later), but I am rather a fan of "nothing is scarier than what I won't show you", which is where Pontypool seems to be pointing.
But then again, to each their own!
This post also gives me a chance to show-case my scary new user icon!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 02:45 pm (UTC)Zombie dragon pirates will be the next thing. It'll be a Michael Bay movie too. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 03:09 pm (UTC)You know, I could get the same effect by turning on Fox News.
I'm not blind to the metaphor. I appreciate classics like Night of the Living Dead and the shopping mall setting of Dawn.
With some labored effort, I could even extend the metaphor to, say, Marvel Zombies, where the fantasy of the superhuman blah blah blah.
It's the zombie bandwagon that's passed me by. Sure, the best of this stuff is a barbed commentary on modern consumer culture and man's inhumanity to man. Even the worst of it plays into that unintentionally. But Sturgeon's Observation still holds, and Marvel Zombies is still just a lame play on words pushed way too far.
I don't have an aversion to zombie movies. I'm indifferent to them, and I'm immune to the current memetic strain that asserts that the mere presence of shambling corpses (or variations thereof) can make a crappy movie watchable.
I mean, it's not like they're dragons (clutches his DVD of D-Wars protectively).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 05:40 pm (UTC)It also fits into the junk-culture-is-cool thing we have going on. So your "mere presence of shambling corpses (or variations thereof) can make a crappy movie watchable" comment - I think it's that the mere presence of shambling corpses reassures the viewer that this is not a great movie, that it's okay to like it despite it being total crap. With horror films becoming legitimized, there's this big push to have stuff which is really shocking and horrifying and yadda yadda, and zombies, you come in expecting it to be cheese as well as horror. A little like how people used to approach slasher films.
I think the bandwagon aspect is hilarious in its irony this way. What is pretty much a metaphor for American brainlessness and consumerism catches on; and because people think it's trendy, it starts becoming a bigger trend. This means people can really make book on brainlessness and consumerism because everybody likes zombie films, right? I'd say whoever came up with steampunk and zombies in the same setting would be making a ton of money, but then I look over at the Privateer Press guys and yeah.
And what really gets me is that zombies, in folklore? They're not rotting, they're just dead guys. They do work unstoppably in the hot sun for hours and they won't notice until you feed them salt. The Toutons Macoutes were believed to be zombies, because they were the unstoppable unthinking agents of the authorities. So in a way, the metaphor's gone right back to Afro-Carribean roots.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 06:38 pm (UTC)People seem to love vampires for being sexy, which makes me wonder, are all these people that heavily into biting and bloodplay? I think I read somewhere that the Twilight vampires don't drink people's blood anyway. That and the thing about sparkling in sunlight instead of dying makes me wonder, why call them vampires at all? Why not elves or something?
And zombies? Reanimated rotting corpses? Can't be made sexy at all. Just disgusting.
And I want more dragon stuff too!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 08:28 pm (UTC)And don't get me started about how the current crop of Romero-inspired Living Dead are completely divorced from the Afro-Caribbean culture that gave us the word "zombie". Voodoo zombies are a lot more interesting than the plague-virus shamblers.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-23 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 07:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 02:42 pm (UTC)I'll run with that!
Maybe colour would help...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-24 08:15 pm (UTC)I think people also forget that just because it's popular, or in style, that it doesn't have anything new to offer. Two of my favorite periods in architecture, Art Deco, in large part stemmed from a large Egyptian meme that came with the discovery of tomb of Tutankhamun.
Weather it's fine art or popular culture: There is nothing new. What matters is, what you bring to the table when an arrest has their hand at it.
I'm not trying to defend the zombie mame especially I frankly find most of the "X of the dead" and "28X latter" movies pretty boring, and maybe SotD and Zombieland aren't your particular brand of humor. I just think it's as shallow dismissing something for it's popularity as it is embracing it for it's fashionably.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-25 06:51 am (UTC)