Page Summary
silussa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
archteryx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hedgegoth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cpxbrex.livejournal.com - (no subject)
archteryx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hafoc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cpxbrex.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hafoc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cpxbrex.livejournal.com - (no subject)
athelind.livejournal.com - Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
athelind.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cpxbrex.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
athelind.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
cpxbrex.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
athelind.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Style Credit
- Style: Sunset for Stepping Stones by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 08:10 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1401213448/boingboing/ <-- kirby omnibus of the DC 4th world stuff from 70s
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 09:02 pm (UTC)Tho' your interpretation is probably dead on. The replicants were at least as human as humans, and most of them far moreso than a burnout like Deckard.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 11:57 pm (UTC)Personally, I think the writers of that movie were so clever casting doubt on Deckard's status that the only solution in accord with all evidence is that he is neither human nor (conventional) replicant. Perhaps I should rant on that in my own journal.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-05 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-05 12:40 am (UTC)Remember how Deckard convinced Rachel she was a replicant? He told her about her memories. How could he know what her secret memories were? Because somebody had fed those memories into her, and the memories were described in a file he read. So if her memories were artificial, she must be also. QED. Right?
One of the scenes cut out of the first theatrical Blade Runner but included in the "director's cut" version is a dream sequence in which Deckard sees a herd of unicorns running through a forest.
At the end, as he and Rachel are bolting from the apartment, he kicks something over. Bends down and picks it up. It is one of Gaff's origami animals, the ones he was always leaving around as unspoken messages. And this one is a unicorn.
Deckard picks it up, holds it in his fist, grim look on face, nods decisively. Some question that's been bugging him has just been answered. I always thought the answer was simple-- would Gaff and Co. hunt down Rachel and kill her? Gaff was there and let her live, so they can go off and live happily ever after.
But if you include the unicorn dream sequence in the movie, the answer becomes a bit different, doesn't it? For how could Gaff know Deckard's dreams? Because those dreams were fed into him, and Gaff had seen them described in some file he read. And if Deckard's dreams are artificial...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-05 12:45 am (UTC)Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Date: 2007-05-05 03:53 am (UTC)And who played Gaff?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-05 03:58 am (UTC)Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Date: 2007-05-05 05:03 am (UTC)But I'd GUESS Edward James Olmos. ;)
Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Date: 2007-05-05 05:47 am (UTC)But, jeez Louise, I know there are a BUNCH of BSG fans out there.
Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Date: 2007-05-05 05:49 am (UTC)Re: Wow, nobody's really gotten it..
Date: 2007-05-05 01:39 pm (UTC)I think you'll like it. It's Very You.