athelind: (Default)
athelind ([personal profile] athelind) wrote2004-12-08 12:32 pm

What Party Does Your Retail Dollar Support?

Blue Christmas

This hooks in neatly with [livejournal.com profile] cargoweasel's recent comments about Economic Activism.

[identity profile] hedgegoth.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Hrm. They fail to note other things that the retailers do for the community beyond political contributions.
Sears is heavy Republican donator, something that puts them in my good bucket though is that Sears pays the difference in salaries and maintains benefits for their called-up military reservist employees.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/sears.asp

*shrug* I'd just be biased against utilizing just one thing to determine at which retailer I spend my money.

[identity profile] cargoweasel.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
They do point that out in their documentation, that this is just an early example and they will be going into more detail about each company's practices.

[identity profile] tikaani.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
They have a lot more work to do, since it's claiming "2004 donations" yet lists "Tricon Global Restaurants" as a donator, a company which hasn't existed since 2002.

[identity profile] cargoweasel.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Tricon changed their name to the much friendlier sounding Yum! Brands but they're still the same company.

[identity profile] tikaani.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Reasons aside, they've been giving money for two years under another name, been operating as such, doing SEC reporting as such, but this list doesn't have that? That's all.

[identity profile] cargoweasel.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that clearly invalidates the entire effort. Why should they even bother?

[identity profile] tikaani.livejournal.com 2004-12-08 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
*sigh* I never said it invalidated their effort, It just points out they obviously have a lot of work to do before one could even consider it accurate.