athelind: (Default)
[personal profile] athelind
I'm watching The Spirit. A couple of months back, when Blockbuster was closing down most of its stores, I picked up the DVD for $2.

I'm barely out of the credits, and I'm wondering if I was overcharged.

If I had a Twitter account I'd be liveblogging this.

It's very Frank Miller, in all the wrong ways, but there's not a hell of a lot of Will Eisner in here. Not script-wise, not visually.

For the love of Schwartz, we have Thugs Wearing T-Shirts With Thematic Code-Names on them.
This is, in fact, the Frank Miller version of the 1966 Batman series.

With some Warner Brothers thrown in.

Miller thinks "campy slapstick" is the same as "tongue-in-cheek whimsy", and "over-the-top stunt action" can sub for "magical realism".

I can see, in my mind's eye, a scene drawn by Eisner (or Darwyn Cooke), with the comic';s cast watching this, Ellen, Doyle, and Ebony laughing their asses off while the Spirit himself just cringes in humiliation.

The one bright spot is that this movie isn't disappointing me. It's performing to expectations.

Okay, I turned it off at the 62-minute mark. I'm not sure when I stopped actually paying attention to it.

Don't think that I'm just ragging on this as a bad adaptation. No, it's a bad movie, and there are any number of bad decisions contributing to that. For far too many of them, the only explanation that makes sense is that Miller was trying to emulate the source material and failing miserably.

I think he doesn't quite realize that Will Eisner and Harvey Kurtzman were different people. This is a Mad Magazine version of The Spirit.

For most of the others, it was evident that he wasn't able to resist throwing in Millerisms, or possibly attempts at self-parody.

Date: 2010-03-20 03:35 am (UTC)
zeeth_kyrah: A glowing white and blue anthropomorphic horse stands before a pink and blue sky. (Default)
From: [personal profile] zeeth_kyrah
I saw the trailers, and I read the marketing blurb on the case, and that was enough to convince me that the Spirit of the comics wasn't there.

Date: 2010-03-20 03:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
The trailers had me vaguely interested. But then I don't read comics so... who knows. Maybe I might have liked it. Maybe not.

Date: 2010-03-20 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Really, I tried hard to watch the movie as A Thing In Itself, and I COULDN'T -- Miller makes too many ham-fisted moves that are obviously failed attempts at Eisner references, but are just weird and stupid outside of that context.

Date: 2010-03-20 04:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Guess I wouldn't have then.


athelind: (Default)

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

November 2016

6 78 9101112


Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 07:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios